![]() ![]() Remember, he used the word "individual," which means he was not talking about her body of work. It is a suggestion that a journalist, doing her job, telling a story, bringing new perspectives to the world in which Tinder dominates, is open to personal criticism, exposure, shaming. "(T)here's some stuff about her as an individual that will make you think differently," he is quoted by the London Evening Standard as saying. But what is not acceptable was the veiled, personal threat Rad made to Sales herself, based on what he called his "background research." That piece certainly is open to fair criticism, notably in that it suggests casual sex didn't occur in the world until we Neanderthals learned to swipe right. What is most troubling is Rad's attitude toward Vanity Fair journalist Nancy Jo Sales, who wrote a critical piece earlier this year of Tinder's role in promoting hookup culture in the country. Related: How Leaders, in Politics and Business, Use Influence Instead of Powerīut even that gaffe, as awkward and uncomfortable as it is, can be forgiven. Instead he comes across as a grocer who doesn't know the difference between chives and green onions. ![]() However, someone whose business is based so firmly on les affaires du coeur should know his art, as it were.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |